#OS X MAVERICKS 10.9 5 FULL#

This is something that you WILL NOT understand. If Mavericks is to be given a chance for 8, it would have been equal if not coming close to the latter's performance and stability. Granted Mavericks will only have 5 maintenance releases with the upcoming 10.9.5 soon, compared to Snow Leopard with 8. Right now I find more tiny bugs on Mavericks than in Snow Leopard. Anything beyond that are craps just to lure Windows losers over for a bigger market share. Snow Leopard, though without major features, was the high point release that some people here are still using - stability and efficiency. IMO the last major features ever introduced by Apple enough to wow the crowd would probably be Leopard.

#OS X MAVERICKS 10.9 5 FULL#

Useless features like Full Screen crap and Window Resizing from every other corner is just another Windows-copied-over features, which I think don't even qualify as features. Well let me tell you something - every OS X releases prior to Lion is way much better than what you think you now have. And Tiger happened to be one of the most stable OS X releases to date with 11 maintenance releases.Īnd since you've come from the Windows :rolleyes: world I bet you have not used anything before Mavericks or even before Lion.? It's sad that recent Apple efforts have only attracted Windows users like you to OS X just to heap praises around how superior Mavericks is to Windows. 3-4 years.? Where did you get that idea anyway.? The longest OS X iterations has been 10.4 Tiger for 30 months before Leopard came out (and if you failed math, 30 months is LESS than 3 years).

Os x mavericks 10.9 5